In today’s society, alcohol is seen as a sinful delight. It is portrayed in health classes as a liquid that will ruin one’s life as soon as it passes over the tongue. This “devil’s nectar”, however, has an age requirement of twenty-one. For some reason, the government feels that once one reaches that unnecessarily distant age they are more equipped to handle the beverage. Overall, the nation’s view of alcohol is outdated and immature, proving to the world that America is once again, behind the times.
America is constantly being compared to its European brothers. Everything from the economy to education is compared. One aspect of the European culture that is often overlooked is their acceptance of alcohol. In the United States, alcohol seems almost like a taboo subject. Overseas, young children are raised drinking wine and are taught to respect the drink. According to the Cabrini College website www.theloquitur.com, “Allowing children to experience alcohol at a young age, under supervision, is a trend that runs throughout Europe.” The only information children receive in America is the downsides of drinking. This is an unfortunate way of dealing with the subject. Children should be taught to respect the drink and use it responsibly at an early age. Therefore, many alcohol abuse related accidents could be avoided.
When an individual turns eighteen in the U.S, many doors are opened. That individual can now smoke, vote, have sex, gamble, buy a gun, get married, serve on a jury, pay taxes and even die for their country. According to Princeton’s newspaper, the Daily Princetonian, “Changing the drinking age to 18 would not only place it in line with the allotment of other rights and obligations, it would also be more logical in terms of contemporary life.” America can send an eighteen year-old overseas to a foreign land to die in a warzone. Apparently, one can be old enough to kill but not old enough for drinking. Since when is there an age where it is okay to kill another human being? A legal adult in the United States is age eighteen. According to the government, they must wait three more years to fully be considered an adult. The following is a song written and performed by a very outspoken musician known as Mojo Nixon. The material is evidently dated, but the message transcends through generations.
“you know if Reagan finally gets the war he’s lookin for you think he’s gonna be draftin’ 21 year olds? No man they’re gonna be draftin’ 18 and 19 year olds but ya cant buy beer you can get married and screw yourself up real good but ya can’t buy beer ya can charge 8 million dollars on the mastercharge but ya can’t buy beer you can vote for one fool or another but ya can’t buy beer ’cause this is America.”
The hypocrisy is painfully evident. The great United States of America has its priorities tragically skewed.
Lowering the drinking age would not only save lives but money as well. According to www.theloquitor.com, “underage drinking is costing Americans nearly $53 billion annually.” If the drinking age was lowered to the sensible age of eighteen, all this money could be saved. Imagine pouring billions of dollars back into the economy annually. Each state would have a significant amount to fix up its less fortunate areas, fix schools or even research alternative energy. By lowering the drinking age, many underage drinkers would be deterred from drinking because the “thrill” is no longer there. The main reason for underage drinking is experiencing the excitement of doing something illegal and hoping not to get caught. Dropping the legal drinking age by three years would eliminate most underage drinking due to the fact that most of the offenders are between the ages of eighteen and twenty-one.
Lowering the drinking age would undoubtedly be hectic a first. For the first few months, years even, many eighteen to twenty year-olds would be getting drunk more often than they already do. At first, the law may seem like a bad idea, but in time it will prove to be an effective means of controlling America’s unquenchable thirst. College parties would still have alcohol, but they may be less apt to accept people that were underage. If drinking was legal at eighteen, college campuses would not have to spend as much time hunting down underage drinkers at parties. All in all, the pros far outweigh the cons in the debate over lowering the drinking age. As soon as a U.S citizen is considered an adult, they should be able to enjoy a cold one. The drinking age should indubitably be lowered to the age of eighteen. If only the people in power would come to their senses and realize how backwards our society really is
Works Cited
McKee, Kelly. “Alcohol laws: U.S. vs. U.K.” 28 Oct. 2004. Cabrini College. 3 Nov. 2008 <http:/media.www.theloquitur.com>.
Mojo Nixon. Burn Down the Malls. Rec. 21 May 1986. Tallywacker Tunes, 1986.
Reilly, Katherine. “Why 21? The reasons for lowering the drinking age.” 2 May 2002. Princeton University. 24 Nov. 2008 <http:/www.dailyprincetonian.com/>
